Pharmaceutical manufacturing

Improving reliability competence across a multi-site team

A global pharmaceutical company wanted its Reliability team to build the confidence, technical depth and practical capability needed to improve equipment reliability and future production opportunity.

6 monthsfrom baseline to advanced knowledge
6 peopleReliability team supported
9 areasidentified in the competence matrix
3 facilitiesincluded in the pilot programme

Context

Knowledge needed to become applied capability.

The flagship multi-site facility covered API, sterile, OSD, narcotics, inspection and packaging operations. The company wanted stronger reliability engineering capability across this complex environment.

Improved competence was expected to support equipment reliability, reduce unplanned downtime, increase production opportunities and develop the personal characteristics of future leaders.

Baseline

Basic understanding

The team needed a clearer route from awareness to consistent application.

Target

Advanced knowledge

Competence had to be measurable, coached and connected to daily reliability work.

Scope

Multi-site pilot

The approach was tested across three facilities with local and global collaboration.

Approach

Build the matrix, teach the method, coach the application.

RTL combined a tailored competence matrix, interactive training and side-by-side site support so the team could apply the learning to real work.

Assess

Benchmark the Reliability function and identify nine key areas with supporting subtopics.

Structure

Develop a tailored Competence Matrix with clear progression and regular one-to-one assessments.

Teach

Use existing SOPs, fill documentation gaps and deliver personalised, interactive training with practical examples.

Coach

Work alongside the local team during a three-facility pilot, mentoring Reliability Engineers as they applied the methods.

Develop

Provide continuous feedback, define the next steps and strengthen confidence in FMEA, Root Cause Analysis and Bad Actor Analysis.

What changed

Technical tools became part of the team's operating rhythm.

The work focused on the quality of application, not just completion of a training package.

Improved FMEA quality, more thorough Root Cause Analysis and the introduction of Bad Actor Analysis helped the team target repeat breakdowns and identify failure modes that had previously been missed.

Better FMEA

Historic FMEA was reviewed and revised to address low detectability and high-occurrence failure modes.

Root-cause focus

Corrective actions were rolled out to similar assets where repeat failures were identified.

Confidence in practice

Mentorship and regular assessment connected technical knowledge to day-to-day decisions.

Result

From basic understanding to advanced knowledge in six months.

The programme improved competence and practical reliability work while developing a stronger internal capability for the future.

Basic → Advancedaverage competence level across the team
6 monthsperiod in which the average competence level increased
6 peopleReliability team members supported
9 areascovered by the competence matrix

The source case study also records recognition for “Best Teamwork in a Project” at the annual Global Engineering Conference. This page presents the evidence as supplied by RTL.

Next step

Does your team know what good looks like in practice?

RTL can help assess capability, build a practical development route and support engineers as they apply the learning on site.